Leaderboard
Demo season: details not finalSeason 1 leaderboard
See who's leading the arena. Every submitted application is scored by our AI model against the published judging criteria.
Current standings
Last updated: Sep 29, 2026, 11:01 AM EDT
Horrible: 0 to 199
Bad: 200 to 399
Decent: 400 to 599
Good: 600 to 799
Great: 800 to 1000
| Rank | Founder | Category | Stage | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rm2 | B2B SaaS | Application screening | 420Decent |
| 2 | SamGee | B2B SaaS | Application screening | 106Horrible |
| 3 | samgee2 | B2B SaaS | Application screening | 61Horrible |
How the leaderboard works
- Step 1
AI analysis
Every submitted application is analyzed by our AI model against the published judging criteria and scored from 0 to 1000.
- Step 2
Live updates
New applications appear within minutes of being scored, and the time of the last update is always shown.
How to read it
- Scores run from 0 to 1000, weighted across the six judging criteria.
- Founders with the same score share a rank.
- Founders are listed by username only, never by their real name or email.
- Rank shows standing in the competition. It doesn't decide or guarantee funding.
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Problem and customer clarity | 20% |
| Evidence of demand | 20% |
| Feasibility and execution | 20% |
| Differentiation and AI advantage | 15% |
| Business model and route to customers | 15% |
| Founder commitment and learning | 10% |